E
|
|
The following report
describes the findings of the Board of Inquiry investigation of the
collapse of the Kinzua Viaduct that occurred on |
Photograph Courtesy of PennDOT |
· · ·
Nature can be beautiful. Nature can be powerful. Nature can be cruel. On
· · ·
A wide range of severe
weather moved into western
The tornado, classified
as a F-1, by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, on the Fujita Scale with estimated wind speeds exceeding 90
mph, produced a complex pattern of high velocity winds in the immediate
vicinity of the structure; but nevertheless, left an ordered debris path
extending 1/3 of a mile in width. Wind
impinged the structure initially from the east due to the counter clockwise
rotation of winds within the tornado vortex.
As the vortex trailed northward moving past the structure, the structure
was re-attacked from the south by a strong inflow of air spiraling into the
tornado vortex.
The spectacular collapse
of twenty-three of the forty-one structure span was rapid but proceeded in
three discrete and separate episodes.
The “weak-link” of the structure, from which the collapse initiated, was
the anchorage system at the base of the towers eastern face. Due to a specific hidden deterioration within
the anchorage system, the structure was especially vulnerable from high winds
attacking from an easterly direction.
Anchor bolts at the base of the collapsed towers failed rapidly by one
of two modes of separation resulting in separate and distinct segments of the
structure becoming airborne upon attack by the wind. The orientation and location of the debris
field of the structure identified the specific wind directions and order of
collapse. The majority of large-scale
distortions within the viaduct’s debris field are attributable to secondary
impact damage as the airborne structure segments became earthbound.
The spectacular collapse
of a significant portion of a civil engineering landmark is a tragic loss to
the citizens of the